woolymonkey: (wtf?)
[personal profile] woolymonkey
Dear wonderful, erudite friendslist, especially Eng. Lit. graduates, artists and musicians,  And [profile] artaxastra,

I think I'm going to apply to tutor a course which could be summed up as Everything About All of the Arts Ever.  The job spec requires me to know about: (take a deep breath)  "history, art history, philosophy, classical studies, history of science, religious studies, music and English".  Also, "to teach ... a wide range of arts and humanities subjects, some of which may be outside your own specialism".  Phew!

It's possible that ALL these areas are outside my specialism, but I'm hoping no-one else is going to offer more than patchy knowledge and bluff, just like me.  Feel free to suggest on any of them, but there are three where I could especially use some help:

1. English lit - especially The Great Novels.  I'm OK (for bluffing purposes) on lit theory, analysis, that crap - it's just that most of the "literary" texts I know are in French or German.   Great excuse to catch up on serious reading, but where do I start? (Not Shakespeare or Chaucer - I've actually studied them!)  Also, is there a really basic bluffer's-guide-style overview of English lit that would help me slot what I read into a neat sequence of movements and periods?  To recap: I can do the fancy stuff and the Big Questions (tragedy, irony, deconstruction, that jazz) but I'm embarrassingly lacking in basic knowledge.

2. Art history.  On this one, I confess total ignorance and lack of ability.  Unable to process pictures without lots of words.  Please help!

3. Shostakovich.  His string quartets are a set work.  I think I hate Shostakovich.  He's the reason I keep having to switch off Radio Three.  Please persuade me he's wonderful!

And a bonus question for
[profile] artaxastra:
What's a good, factual book for learning about Cleopatra - not just her life but how she's been understood and portrayed since she lived?

All suggestions welcome.  I have good library access, so old and obscure books or journals aren't a problem - in fact they're a plus because I can read them for free.

Thanks in advance!



Date: 2008-04-09 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teenybuffalo.livejournal.com
Are you looking for exposition from us, right here, or recommendations of books? I have a wide but erratic interest in art, and could tell you a bit about the Pre-Raphaelites or recommend a couple of books and schools of painting.

Here is a 1066 And All That look at the history of English painting:

There were the Elizabethans who stood stiffly and had no shadows on their faces. Then there were the Jacobeans who had giant ruffs and giant pants, and in the early 1700s there were family groups in three-cornered hats, floofy men's wigs and long thin dresses for the women. And some pretty horses by Stubbs, and a picture of a zebra. The Classical Age all read Pope and had beautiful, delicate white hands with pointy fingers. They draped swaths of silk around themselves and stood near marble pillars. Then Romanticism hit, and men wore long pants and their hair whipped around wildly as if in a gale. The women wore white nighties or historical costuming. William Blake made some engravings of people bugging their eyes out. (Jolly good, too.) After that nothing interesting happened until the Pre-Raphaelites, who all painted mediaeval knights, Renaissance murderers, horny shepherds, and big chubby women with lots of hair and fancy barrettes. They did such finely detailed backgrounds that your eyes can pick out every tiny little blade of grass in the lawn behind the hero. Edward Lear, who was not just a limerick-writer, painted some fantastic pictures and he tried to be a Pre-Raphaelite but he couldn't stand the strain of painting every leaf on every tree. They (the P-R.s, not the trees) lasted till the 1880s and then the rot set in (Joseph Mallord William Turner helped the rot set in by painting splotchy pictures of steamers and railway trains and murky sunsets earlier in the century) and we had Impressionism and Pointillism and God forbid Abstract Art and the whole world of painting went to heck in a handbasket.

Date: 2008-04-14 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] woolymonkey.livejournal.com
Thank you! The 1066 guide to painting is great. Everything (and I mean everything) I already knew but could never remember or get to hang together. And now it's funny and memorable. I shall stroll round art galleries sounding informed.

When I posted, I was looking forward to a quiet week or so to curl up and get to grips with The Whole of World Art. That's on hold now due to a sudden need to understand German documents about car repair software but I'll be getting back to it when I can.

Thanks for your help - it's much appreciated.

Profile

woolymonkey: (Default)
woolymonkey

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 05:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios